Abstract

Clinical sociology and social work are closely related fields that focus on understanding and solving social problems. Both disciplines developed from early social reform movements that aimed to improve the living conditions of people affected by poverty, inequality, and social change. Over time, they have grown in different directions, with clinical sociology focusing more on social analysis and structural issues, and social work focusing on direct support and services for individuals and families. This study aims to compare clinical sociology and social work by examining their historical development, roles, methods, similarities, and differences. It also explores how both fields can work together to address modern social problems more effectively. The study is based on qualitative secondary data. Information was collected from books, journal articles, and other academic sources. A comparative and thematic analysis was used to understand the key features of both disciplines and to identify their contributions to social welfare. The findings show that both fields share a strong commitment to social justice and human well-being. However, they differ in their approaches. Clinical sociology mainly focuses on structural and community-level issues, while social work focuses on individual and family-level interventions. The study also finds that both disciplines use different methods but can complement each other in practice. There is strong potential for collaboration, especially in areas such as community development, policy-making, and mental health support. In conclusion, clinical sociology and social work are both important in addressing social issues with practical intervention. Working together, these fields can contribute more effectively to social change and the improvement of people's lives. Their combined approach can provide better solutions by connecting social analysis

How to Cite This Article

Rights